/socialketchup/media/media_files/2025/11/20/the-family-man-recap-2025-11-20-16-29-57.png)
A reminder of why The Family Man is a show that cuts through clichés, exposes the puppeteers behind the chaos, and insists on empathy in places where most thrillers offer only fear!
The idea that a full-fledged intelligence team is working every single day to neutralise threats long before they become life-threatening was, for most of us, almost unimaginable. After all, despite having agencies like R&AW (Research and Analysis Wing) their inner workings have always felt like a mystery, somewhere hidden, distant, and wrapped in layers of secrecy. Our on-screen agentsdidn’t help either. They looked more like Pathaan or Tiger, leaping off buildings, stopping trains, and performing stunts closer to what James Bond or Ethan Hunt would do. The quieter, more procedural side of intelligence work, the kind that CIA or MI6 stories often show, where threats are tracked and dismantled long before they explode, felt like a genre reserved exclusively for the West.
Also Read: Nishaanchi 2 seems to be grappling with what is now widely seen as the Anurag Kashyap problem!
Which is why Raj and DK's The Family Man arriving in 2019 felt like a jolt, a necessary shake-up to our stereotypes. It reimagined the Indian intelligence narrative as something grounded, relatable, and unexpectedly human. Yes, it was a spy thriller, but not one centred on a hyper-stylised superhero spy. Instead, it introduced us to Srikant Tiwari (Manoj Bajpayee), a middle-class man with loan EMI's, school-drop duties, marital tensions, and a job at T.A.S.C. (Threat Analysis and Surveillance Cell), an intelligence unit under the NIA. A man who picks up his kids and chases terrorists through crowded streets in the afternoon. For the first time, we weren’t just watching an “agent”; we were watching a real person doing an extraordinary job while still being painfully, hilariously ordinary.
But beyond being a show about a family man who might carry a gun in his vegetable basket, the show gradually evolved into an inquiry into the complex socio-political tensions that grip the country. It confronted how Islam is often stereotyped as the default producer of terrorists in mainstream narratives, and then expanded its gaze to the Tamil rebellion, a conflict rooted in Sri Lankan history but one that, in the show, becomes a lens to examine how geopolitical agendas between neighbouring nations collide and mutate. So it feels almost inevitable that we now move to Nagaland, into the fraught and layered politics of Northeast India, where insurgencies continue, borders blur, and allegiances stretch all the way to China.
But before diving into that, it’s worth revisiting how the first two seasons built the show into a mirror of the very socio-political anxieties it refuses to look away from!
The Act of Humanizing
From the very beginning, the show refused to indulge in the lazy binaries that most spy thrillers thrive on. There are no heroes or villains here, just people shaped by the circumstances they were born into. Srikant himself is the biggest reminder of this. And with all his ordinariness, became the anchor that forced us to look at “the other side” with equal empathy. Season 1 introduced Moosa Rahman, the ISIS-trained Kerala engineer, who wasn’t a monster but a man carrying the trauma of being hunted for his identity, someone who didn’t wake up wanting bloodshed but was pushed into a radical ideology that offered him a sense of belonging. Sajid, too, was not a generic villain from central casting. A Kashmiri boy whose life was shaped by suspicion, profiling, and systemic rejection, he clung to the only ideology that embraced his anger. Season 2 continued this gaze with Raji, a Tamil rebel whose entire being was an act of survival. Invisible to the world, abused into submission, and stripped of dignity, she held on to the only thing that gave her meaning - her mission. This is also why Sajid and Raji find an uncanny kinship, in Season 2, as they are two people born from different lands yet moulded by similar wounds. This humanistic lens stands tall against the stereotypical nationalism-driven narratives of the genre. It insists on empathy, not as endorsement but as understanding, and that nuance is what has kept the show ahead of the curve.
The game is much bigger than it seems on ground
But even as it humanizes its “foot soldiers,” the show never forgets to show the bigger puppeteer, the invisible architect pulling the strings. Moosa, Sajid, Raji or any other person are just small players in a design conceived far away from the battleground. Season 1’s enemy wasn’t Moosa, it was ISI Major Sameer, the mastermind behind Project Zulfiqar. His plan wasn’t to execute one dramatic attack but to engineer a nationwide catastrophe. A toxic gas leak in Delhi that would wipe out civilians by the thousands and destabilize the country overnight. Every slip-up, escape, explosion, and chase led to this singular goal of causing panic on a national scale. Season 2 escalated this idea. Sameer returns, this time manipulating the Tamil rebels for his own geopolitical ends. The murder of the rebel leader’s brother isn't a personal attack; it’s a calculated move to hijack an existing liberation struggle and repurpose it for Pakistan’s strategic gain. Raji and others think they're fighting for her people by willingly joining the mission to kill the Indian PM by crashing a plane in her meeting with the Sri Lankan PM, but she’s being played by the very forces pretending to empower her. In both seasons, the show exposes a chilling truth that the battlefield isn’t in Kashmir, or Tamil Nadu, or Mumbai. It’s in the conference rooms of foreign agencies, shadow organisations, and political power centres. The violence on the ground is merely an outcome of their chess moves!
Fighting for the nation comes at a deeply personal cost
Every mission has casualties, but the show insists on showing the emotional and psychological debris, not just the body count. The death of Kareem in Season 1 remains one of the show’s most gut-punching moments. A college student who happened to be muslim, mistaken for a threat, killed in a rushed decision and then erased, framed, forgotten, is the kind of tragedy that spy stories usually skip, but here it becomes a moral scar, something that Srikant can get over. Leaving him to leave T.A.S.C and try to be a corporate employee, only to realize he’s too entangled in the game to ever fully leave it. While in season 2 we see that Milind survived the gas leak but suffers quietly from PTSD before meeting a heroic yet heartbreaking end in Season 2. Zoya, beaten within an inch of her life, carries her trauma into the next season as she is seen in a wheelchair. These aren’t background characters thrown away after a mission; they’re reminders that the cost of national security is disproportionately paid by the ones on ground.
Personal vs. Professional
For all the geopolitical drama, the show has always been rooted in a very middle-class conflict of the tug-of-war between the job and the family. Srikant and Suchi’s marriage begins cracking in Season 1 and worsens in Season 2. The Lonavala incident with Arvind, whether emotional or physical, hangs like a ghost over their relationship bringing out the real issue of being unavailable for each other. The show doesn’t sensationalize it; instead, it lets it rot in silence and resentment, exactly how real marriages break. Dhriti, meanwhile, becomes the adolescent embodiment of anger and rebellion. In Season 2, she blames her mother, sneaks around with Salman, and then spirals into danger being kidnapped by a radicalised teenager. It isn’t just a plot twist; it’s a painful reminder that Srikant’s professional life bleeds into his home whether he wants it to or not. This has always been the emotional backbone of the show with Srikant seen fighting two wars - one for his country, and one to keep his family from falling apart.
The addictive cliffhangers
If The Family Man has a signature style apart from Srikant’s one liners, it’s the cliffhangers. Season 1 ends with Delhi moments away from a gas disaster and Sajid and Mossa in a fight. The end result of which we only get to know in the start of Season 2. While Season 2 ends with the hint of a new virus strain brewing in China, and a shift towards the Northeast, which becomes clearer as in Season 3 we enter Nagaland. And every episode within each season ends with its own mini-explosion - literal or emotional. The show has mastered the art of the last-second twist that makes you go “wait, WHAT?” and forces you to hit “next episode” no matter what time it is. It’s addictive, but also deliberate, quite effectively mirroring the constant uncertainty of intelligence work, where nothing gets closure.
Ultimately, The Family Man became a show that broke new ground in the spy-thriller genre, one that families could watch together and then dissect over dinner, even as its geopolitical tensions offered a scathing mirror to the country and the world. And really, who wouldn’t want an intelligence agent who makes you think twice before casually labelling someone a terrorist? The Family Man season 3 streams tomorrow on Amazon Prime Video!
For more, follow us on @socialketchupbinge
/socialketchup/media/agency_attachments/2025/01/15/2025-01-15t065936648z-magazine-logo-black.png)
/socialketchup/media/media_files/2025/10/15/desktop-leaderboard-2025-10-15-12-55-48.png)
Follow Us