/socialketchup/media/post_banners/jgBaPm1UA2a6ErunnV6b.png)
The Supreme Court has put a stay on the implementation of the three farm laws brought in by the govt.
The Supreme Court on Tuesday ruled on the Farmer's Laws, calling its order “extraordinary” and a “victory for fair play”. The laws in concern are firstly, The Farmers’ Produce Trade and Commerce (Promotion and Facilitation) Act, secondly, The Essential Commodities (Amendment) Act, and The Farmer's (Empowerment and Protection) Agreement on Price Assurance and Farm Services Act.
The stay on the implementation of the farm laws in other words means that the Centre cannot, for the time being, cannot proceed with any executive actions to enforce the laws on the farmers. Therefore, the court had formed a four-member committee of experts “to listen to the grievances of the farmers on the farm laws and the views of the government and make recommendations”.
Most importantly, the stay according to the court said, “may assuage the hurt feelings of the farmers” and make them confident enough, so that they may find their way to the negotiating table and all in good faith. In a concluding paragraph of the order, the court said the farmers’ bodies would “perceive” the “extraordinary” stay as an achievement of their peaceful protest “at least for the present”. Moreover, it might just convince these organizations to “encourage” their members to go back to home and to their livelihoods, and thus, protect their lives and health and that of the others too. However, the farmers are concerned that the committee won't be impartial and not make decisions addressing their grievances.
Here are people's reactions to the SC issuing a stay instead of a complete repeal on the farm laws:
Not even once during the hearing today, the Central Govt opposed its laws getting stayed by the #SupremeCourt.#FarmLaws #farmersrprotest
— Utkarsh Anand (@utkarsh_aanand) January 12, 2021
If the Supreme Court is true pro-democracy, should it reject the bills and ensure victory for the farmers and India ?? #SupremeCourt pic.twitter.com/HZWOEGUKfr
— ਬਾਬਾ ਬਖਤੌਰਾ (@jatt_junction) January 12, 2021
#SupremeCourt has found a way to prevent #FarmerProtests planned for Jan 26!
— RadhakrishnanRK (@RKRadhakrishn) January 12, 2021
But there's one bright spot: this represents the first time that a protest has succeeded against #Modi. It was done by a minority community.#FarmLaws will come back though, soon after farmers leave.
#SupremeCourt puts a stay on #FarmerBill2020, slowly farmers will be asked to evacuate protest premises. Farmers will go home, SC will review Farm Bill, it will be approved post Baisakhi(April) farmers will be busy in harvesting, momentum lost
— AParajit Bharat 😌 (@AparBharat) January 12, 2021
Amrinder shocks
Narinder rocks 😎
Don't you have trust in the SUPREME COURT!
— SuperBhakt3 (@SuperBhakt3) January 12, 2021
Le Janta: 🤣🤣👇👇👇👇#SupremeCourt pic.twitter.com/07Y7UCOXOb
The Parliament shamelessly bought the SC, and everybody knows it
— Kunind Singh (@Kunind) January 12, 2021
They put a stay on laws(not a dismissal) and the Attorney General didn't object. Was it all planned already?
PS: The scared govt filed a case against tractor rally#FarmersProtest #SupremeCourt #सुप्रीम कोर्ट pic.twitter.com/ppWLLR0ibn
Why can't the SUPREME COURT ask the PROTESTERS to vacate the area immediately, instead of adjourning the hearing for tomorrow. #SupremeCourt pic.twitter.com/1NJC9lx4TI
— Subba Rao🇮🇳🇮🇳 (@yessirtns) January 11, 2021
The court in addition said that several rounds of negotiations between the Centre and farmers had produced no results.
ALSO READ: Tesla India setting up R&D unit in Bengaluru has revved-up reactions and memes online